I made a half-hearted attempt to colourcode my notes to correspond with what paragraphs I want to do.
Economic Politic Individualistic
Having done this though, I'm seriously rethinking my essay structure. Sulla's reforms were mostly politic in nature, with economic reforms mostly influenced by politics. Really, individual cases are only noteworthy in the case of the Great Proscription, which I am considering making its own paragraph.
New notes are in yellow and enjoy ruining the formatting
The Great Proscription
|
Benefit
|
·
introduced a Capital Levy on the wealthy men
behind the revolution
· the equites were, “deprived of its politically prominent elements, at the same time as it was deprived of power and conspicuous distinction as a class” (1, 24)
·
presented as, "confiscation by the State of
the property of political outlaws" (2, P. 261)
o allowed punishment
of the guilty
o "removal of
dangerous sources of future rebellion" (2, P. 261)
§ "whole towns
were put up for auction" (4, 183)
§ Spoletum,
Praeneste, Interamna and Florentia
o "removal of
great amounts of wealth from hands which had misused it to others which would
(...in political theory) use it better" (2, P. 261)
§ included 40
Senators and 1,600 equites,
c.w. Marius: 50 and 1,000 (2, P. 263).
§ equites were part of the aristocracy, below the patricians
§ punished more
those, "whose only offense was their wealth" (2, P. 264), than
those who physically versed him
§ ie. those who
funded Marius
§ "4,700
persons were entered on the public records as having fallen in the
proscriptions" (4, 183)
§ "shameless
violence" (4, 186)
o the profits of the
proscription, "filled the public treasury to overflowing" (2, 265)
§ despite, "two
talents" (4, 182), being given to those who killed a wanted man
§ despite the
incredibly low prices
§ "sold to
allied and friendly cities their freedom and independence" (8), and was,
"daily confiscating and selling at public auction the wealthiest and
greatest estates" (8)
§ produced
"350,000,000 sesterces" (4, 183)
o purchases,
"bound the buyers to his interests and ensured their wishing to uphold
his acts after his death" (4, 183)
|
Cost
|
·
the Great Proscription was abused to some extent
o Lucius Sergius
Catilina, "legalised his position by getting his brother's name included
in the proscription list" (2, 264)
o Sextus Roscius of
Ameria, "was placed upon the list of the proscribed; murdered by two of
his kinsmen, and his wealth seized" (2, 264)
§ "by the
complicity of Chrysogonus, Sulla's secretary" (2, 264)
§ "they charged
the son with having killed his father" (4, 182)
o "it is
improbable that Sulla either intended, or would voluntarily have allowed,
such disgraceful scandals as these" (2, 265)
§ "there are
faint indications that he resisted abuses where he could" (2, 265)
§ "Crassus
received no furher official employment" (2, 265)
§ seized the
property of someone not officially proscribed
§ "Sulla owed
Crassus too much for severity to be possible" (2, 265)
§ "he owed a
great many people too much" (2, 265)
§ "there is
nothing...to suggest that he would deliberately unravel with one hand the
fabric of law and order he was attempting to weave with the other" (2,
265)
o "public
opinion at large did not distinguish between any hypothetically legitimate or
illegitimate method in these things" (2, 266)
§ "it seems to
have taken the view that the whole scheme was a scandalous one" (2, 266)
·
"no amount of enquiry can square a political
proscription with the laws of ethics" (2, 266)
|
|
Destruction of Samnium
|
Benefit
|
·
"the Samnites had been a disruptive
force" (2, P. 259)
·
role of absolute power allowed for removal of
political instabilities
·
"they had always been ready to wreck Roman
government in the interests of their own independence" (2, P. 260)
|
Creation of the Cornelians
|
Benefit
|
·
around 10,000 men
·
"he selected from the slaves of the
proscribed...the best men he could find" (2, 272)
·
"deliberate and careful choice of new blood
for citizenship" (2, 272)
·
"gave the new men a peculiarly strong
interest in the maintenance of the new constitution" (2, 272)
|
Created the Modern Nation
|
Benefit
|
·
"the old City State ceased to exist, and the
modern nation was born" (2, 272)
·
“realised
that the Italian upper class had to be used for stabilising the republic” (1,
22)
o
“commit[ed]
himself to recognising their rights” (1, 23)
§ “Equal sacrifice demanded equal
recognition” (1, 22)
o
“it
finally threatened to destroy the state” (1, 22)
o “recognised as vital to the survival of
the republic” (1, 25)
·
made any Italian citizen a citizen of Rome
o "all
distinction between the old and the new citizens was swept away" (2,
272)
·
"instituted a definite scheme of local
self-government" (2, 273)
o each city given a
constitution to manage its own affairs
o Roman magistrates
retained power of control over general policy
o "democracy
impossible in the new Rome" (2, 274)
§ due to distance
|
Stabilised the farmers
|
Benefit
|
·
"120,000 small holdings to the discharged
soldiers of his armies" (2, 274)
o "resettling
Italy with precisely the class of small farmer who was most needed" (2,
274)
o "fortifying
his new arrangements with the zealous support of men who had everything to
lose by their alteration" (2, 274)
·
made the land inalienable to solidify their claim
·
removed the corn dole which had previously,
"destroy[ed] the small Italian farmer" (2, 274)
·
basically tried to make the settlements permanent
|
Reformed the Courts
|
Benefit
|
·
created 8 judicial courts
o separated civil
from criminal justice, "for the first time in the history of
law" (2, 275)
§ civil cases tried
by a single judge
§ criminal cases
tried a jury
o one court was for treason
§ made it less
likely that a partisan tribunal (think Quintus Varius), "would ever
again be set up" (2, 275)
o 'De Repetundis'
was put in place to avoid repetition of the events leading to the Mithradatic
war
o Aim was to “take
from the Comitia the settlement of criminal cases” (4, 196)
§ “obviate the
necessity for appointing special commissions” (4, 196)
·
practically abolished the death penalty
o assembly had the
right to sentence to death, but did not have power in the courts
·
judices were drawn, “from the senators instead of
the equites”
|
Reformed the Senate
|
Benefit
|
·
made senators irremovable
o previously the
censor had been used to pass its friends into the senate and remove, "as
many men of enlightenment from it as possible" (2, 275)
·
entrance into senate was now by popular election
·
“his main object was to restore the authority of
the senate, and to do more than restore it, to give it such power as might,
if it was true to itself, secure it from mob-rule on the one hand and tyranny
on the other” (4, 190)
·
“deliberating on a measure before it was
submitted to the vote of the Comitia” (4, 191)
o “one security against any measures
being carried against its wishes” (4, 191)
·
“legislative
power was placed wholly in the Senate’s hands” (4, 191)
·
“the
answer was to give the state a single head again…that head could only be the
senate” (1, 23)
·
“the
senate became supreme beyond challenge” (1, 23), in all areas
|
Reorganised the Magistracies
|
Benefit
|
·
increased numbers
o "to deal with
the increasing amount of business that passed through their hands" (2,
276)
·
kept civil and military apart
o "impossible
for a civil magistrate to hold at the same time a military office" (2,
276)
·
made it illegal to have an office for several
years in succession
·
this had several aims
o "prevented
the magistracies from becoming the close preserve of a clique" (2, 276)
o allowed work to be
done by "properly elected men" (2, 276) with "official
experience, who knew something of the business of administration" (2,
277)
|
Reduced the Influence of the equites
|
Benefit
|
·
removed their control over the courts, "back
to the senatorial order" (2, 274)
·
The
creation of the equites by Gracchus, “ma[de] the state two-headed” (1, 22)
o
“lead
to serious discord” (1, 22)
o
“it
was a disturbing and not a regulating influence: power without responsibility,
political leverage without political interests or indeed policies” (1, 22)
o
“threatened
to produce…anarchy, to make the state ungovernable” (1, 22)
o
"chief
anarchic force of the nineties" (1, 23)
· “the political differences between the two leading orders were significantly reduced by the adlection of so many eminent equites into the Senate” (1, 25)
·
"swept away all the privileges that had made
them a definite class in the State" (2, 274)
o Removal, “of the reserved seats
appropriated to the equites at public services” (4, 197)
·
removed the capacity to farm the taxes
o "converted
the taxes into fixed amounts" (2, 274)
|
Minor Changes to the Citizen Assembly
|
Benefit
|
·
could only assent or veto legislation that had
passed the senate
·
also known as the Comitia Tributa
|
Changed the Requirements to be Consul
|
Benefit
|
·
to reduce chance of a repeat of Marius, “to
prevent any individual again obtaining undue influence” (4, 193)
·
“to exalt the Senate’s authority at its expense” (4,
193)
·
Made it so one could not be consul, “till he had
been first quaestor and then praetor” (4, 193)
·
Could not be consul again, “till after a period
of ten years” (4, 193)
|
Introduced Marriage and Sumptuary Laws
|
Cost
|
·
"introduce marriage and sumptuary laws for
the citizens" (8)
o laws to restrict
lavishness basically
o "while he
himself was living in lewdness and adultery" (8)
o "Sulla, who
knew no restraint in his extravagance, tried to bring the citizens into ways
of sobriety" (8)
·
“sumptuary law, which is said to have limited the
price of certain luxuries” (4, 198)
o “it would have
encouraged instead of checking gluttony” (4, 198)
|
Stabilised Country
|
Benefit
|
·
"he
despatched Pompeius to Sicily and Africa, to recover those provinces and to
resettle them" (2, P. 259)
·
"restored
[Athens] to freedom and independence" (8), even though it fought against
him in favour of Mithridates
|
Reduced the Influence of the tribunate
|
Cost
|
·
“amongst
Sulla’s measures was an attempt to deprive the tribunate of its strength and
power”(3, 9)
o “for ten years this was an issue of
conflict until gradually all the prerogatives of the tibunes were restored”
(3, 9)
o “tribunes…play[ed] an important
supporting role in this final phase of the Republic” (3, 9)
§ ie. the fall of the Republic
§ “closely linked to the great military
commanders. For it was they who often proposed the laws that granted generals
their commands” (3, 9)
o “Deprived of the power of proposing a
measure at will to the Comitia Tributa” (4, 191)
o “lose the power of prosecuting anyone
before it” (4, 191)
o “those who had been tribunes should
be ineligible to other offices” (4, 191)
o “right of veto seems to have been
left to them” (4, 191)
·
“gagged
free speech by the disabilities attached to the tribunate” (4, 198)
|
Led to Republic’s Fall
|
Cost
|
·
“some
form of predominance had become regularised” (3, 9)
·
“a
system which could endure only by the repression not only of hostile
interests but of the ambition of its
own adherrents carried in itself the seeds of early dissolution” (4, 198)
·
“abdication
only revealed monarchy, and the broad road which Sulla had laid over the
breakers and quicksands of a revolution in reality paved the way to a throne”
(3, 198)
· “Sulla’s example postponed [the Civil War’s] coming” (1, 29)
o
“corruption
in the senatorial law courts was so blatant that even eminent senators agreed
it must be reformed…to remoe it from the sphere of political agitation” (1, 29)
o
“had
lost the will and the confidence to govern” (1, 30)
o
“Sulla
had left a legacy of guilt” (1, 30)
o
“the
Sullan oligarchy had a fatal flaw: it governed with a guilty conscience” (1,
30)
·
Republic
“had no sense of mission” (1, 30)
o
Between
78 and 59, “when ordered government may be said to have ceased” (1, 30), over
half the consuls, “are not attested in provincial government” (1, 30)
§ “did not want to leave the excitement
of the city, or the pleasures of their villas, for the duties of service abroad”
(1, 30)
o
In
trying to, “provide against excessive ambition” (1, 31), he allowed for, “inertia
and irresponsibility” (1, 31)
|
Intensified Competition for Positions
|
Cost
|
·
“the
reforms of Sulla made the intensity of competition for high office even
greater” (3, 69)
§ Doubled the number of quaestors (from
10 to 20)
§ Added only two to the praetors (from
8)
§ Retained a consulship of two men
·
“more
men than ever before, entering the quaestorship would have had their hopes of
a political career raised; more than ever before would have found the higher
echelons of that career impossible to reach” (3, 69)
o Intensified competition
·
“more
members of the Roman elite were prepared to resort to illicit tactics to
secure the offices they wanted” (3, 69)
o Institutions, “were by-passed as
ambitious politicians found that violence was a more effective way of
achieving their goals” (3, 69)
·
Ultimately
impacted on the effective governing of Rome
o “political leaders were prevented
from going to meetings for fear of their lives” (3, 70)
o “the new year sometimes opened with
major magistrates still not elected, because of constant (potentially
violent) obstruction of elections” (3, 70)
o “the years 53 and 52 opened without
consuls having yet been elected” (3, 70)
|
Sulla’s measures were repealed
|
·
In
the seventies and sixties, “four new provinces were created…yet no more
magistrates were appointed” (1, 28)
·
Tribunal
revived in the seventies
o “the reforms of 70 which completed it
and recalled the equites to…the major share in the courts and hence to
renewed political power” (1, 28)
·
“the
res publica that had broken down for
lack of concordia and had been
replaced by Sulla’s radical reform was now restored, with concordia no nearer” (1, 28)
|
|
Set example for ultimate rule
|
cost
|
·
“Sulla
could not abolish his own example” (1, 28)
o “Sulla’s example also did much to
prevent real imitation” (1,, 28)
§ horror
of proscriptions
o Caesar,
“imitat[ed] his technique” (1, 29)
|
A smart noting system.Very extensive and showing a good understanding ofm the topic.
ReplyDelete